S&I Corporation

End-to-End Strategic Design Research for Digital Transformation Strategy and Product Development

My Role

Strategic Designer
Project Manager

Client

S&I Corporation
Digital Transformation Team

Project Type

GTM Strategy
Product Roadmap

Timeline

4 months

Research Methods

In-depth Interview, Card Sorting
Survey, Behavioral Analysis, JTBD

Team

Lead Consultant
UX Designer

Overview

Bringing Digital Innovation to the Overlooked World of Small Buildings

Background

S&I Corporation, a major player in Korea's facility management industry, sought to expand into the small building management sector. Given the lack of structured digital service models in this segment, our goal was to develop a strategic market entry plan by leveraging UX research, market analysis, and business innovation approaches.

Project Goal

- Identify core customer pain points and existing service gaps.
- Explore opportunities for digital transformation in a fragmented market.
- Develop a scalable and sustainable business model tailored to this segment.

*To respect the client's confidentiality (NDA), only the process and key insights are shared here.

Solution Brief

One-Stop Management Platform

Design-driven Strategic Approach

Delievered comprehensive, actionable market entry strategy, consisting of:

✔ Customer Segmentation & Value Proposition
Identified high-potential user segments
Defined key user needs and differentiated service value.

✔ Service Model Framework
Developed a digital-first service structure based on core user journeys and JTBD
Aligned functional priorities with user pain points

✔ Go-to-Market Strategy
Proposed product roadmap and pricing tiers based on willingness to pay.
Integrated supplier feedback to ensure supply-side feasibility.

I took charge of recruitment, planning interview protocol, and leading the 8 interviews.

Phase 1. Generative Research

Who are the key user groups? 
What are their primary pain points? 

Secondary Research

Conducted an industry landscape analysis by reviewing digital services in the Proptech market. Combined with insights from internal stakeholder workshops, this informed initial hypotheses about target customer characteristics and pain points.

1. Self-managing owners are the main users who will engage with the platform.
2. Leasing feels urgent, but facility management gets delayed even though it matters.
3. Facility management has hidden risks like legal issues, no vendor visibility, and no digital tools.

User Interview

Focus on understanding building management users' experiences and the challenges they face, as well as identifying areas for improvement and the reasons behind their needs.

I took charge of recruitment, planning the interview protocol, and leading the 8 interviews.

Participants
5 Small Building Owners
2 Building Managers
5 Tenant Office Staffs
Interview Methods
In-depth Interview
Card Sorting

Key Questions

How do they manage their building? 
What does "management" mean to them? 
Which aspect do they consider most important? 


Research Insights

We broke the problems into three types of pain points and turned them into opportunity areas for new service ideas.

I facilitated a workshop to synthesize research findings and extract key strategic insights.

Framework
Persona
Behavior Analysis
JTBD (Jobs-To-Be-Done)

Phase 2. Evaluative Research

Does the solution meet user needs while aligning with business goals?

User Testing #1

Collected qualitative feedback on what resonated with them and what needed improvement.

Participants
3 Building Owners
5 Tenants
Test Methods
In-depth Interview
Prototype Feedback

Test Questions

Does the solution align with actual user pain points?
What makes users want to try the service?

User Feedback

Seek cross-category service coverage (repairs, interior, legal, etc.)
Value trustworthy vendor matching
Highlighted the need for responsiveness and reliability
Show demand for task automation, tracking, and visibility


User Testing #2

Conducted a survey targeting users with high initial interest and validated their intent to use and willingness to pay.

Participants
47 Office Admin Managers
Test Methods
Survey

User Feedback

49%

Respondents rated the service 4 or 5 out of 5 in terms of how helpful it would be in their actual work.


43%

Respondents were willing to pay for enhanced services.
Most preferred pricing range: ₩0–30K/month: 35%

Strategic Recommendation

1. Target early MVP to high-frequency B2B tenants.
2. Position value around operational efficiency and vendor reliability.
3. Design pricing tiers that reflect usage frequency and urgency level.
Suppliers Feedback

We interviewed 10 service providers and uncovered three key factors required for entering the small-to-mid-sized building market.

1. Securing a minimum volume of small-scale repair projects
2. Guaranteeing on-time payment within agreed timelines
3. Eliminating high intermediary fees, especially those charged by real estate agents